home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: richardc.demon.co.uk!Richard
- From: Richard Clarke <Richard@richardc.demon.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
- Subject: Re: fastest code
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 21:51:25 +0100
- Organization: None
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <HrcUNFANxXaxEw+s@richardc.demon.co.uk>
- References: <316112A2.7D37@public.sta.net.cn>
- <NFS9dJAHgWYxEwdO@chrism.demon.co.uk> <4k1sntINNdd6@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>
- <FH0GsDAq6iZxEwVz@richardc.demon.co.uk> <4kb898INNqn0@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: richardc.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: richardc.demon.co.uk
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- X-Newsreader: Turnpike (evaluation) Version 1.12 <RT021KpJcT8+ZipKjVALgXIHOV>
-
- In article <4kb898INNqn0@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>, Kazimir Kylheku
- <c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> writes
- >In article <FH0GsDAq6iZxEwVz@richardc.demon.co.uk>,
- >Richard Clarke <Richard@richardc.demon.co.uk> wrote:
- > >In article <4k1sntINNdd6@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>, Kazimir Kylheku
- > ><c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> writes
- > >>In article <NFS9dJAHgWYxEwdO@chrism.demon.co.uk>,
- > >>Chris Marriott <chris@chrism.demon.co.uk> wrote:
- > >>>I've heard it said that Watcom have the best compiler in terms of code
- > >>>speed. What they do NOT have is a particularly good development
- > >>>environment - VC++ is the clear winner in that department.
- > >>
- > >>Who cares? The end user doesn't see the development environment. It's just
- > >>fluff for programmer wannabees.
- > >>--
- > >>
- > >
- > >A good development environment makes it more likely that the user will
- > >end up with a decent piece of software.
- >
- >Statistical proof? Definition of ``good development environment''?
- >--
- >
-
- Common sense, I would have thought.
- --
- Richard Clarke
-
- Turnpike evaluation. For Turnpike information, mailto:info@turnpike.com
-